StakeXDCDocs
Institutional

Integration Models

StakeXDC offers two integration models for exchanges, custodians, and institutional partners. Both leverage the same audited, battle-tested infrastructure.

StakeXDC offers two integration models for exchanges, custodians, and institutional partners. Both leverage the same audited, battle-tested infrastructure.


Model A - White Label

Your brand. Our infrastructure.

The partner operates XDC staking under their own brand, powered by StakeXDC's architecture. End users interact with the partner's interface and never see StakeXDC branding.

What We Provide

  • Full access to the liquid staking contract suite
  • Managed validator infrastructure with SLA
  • Settlement reconciliation data and on-chain proof of reserves
  • Dedicated partner support during and after integration

Partner Responsibilities

  • Frontend development and UX under their own brand
  • User onboarding, KYC/AML (if applicable)
  • Customer support (Tier 1)
  • Regulatory compliance in their jurisdiction

Model B - Powered by StakeXDC

Co-branded integration. Minimal technical lift.

The partner integrates StakeXDC with visible "Powered by StakeXDC" branding. This model requires significantly less development effort.

What We Provide

  • Reuse of the StakeXDC staking flow (a co-branded or embeddable UI, scoped during the integration phase)
  • Co-branded experience with partner logo alongside StakeXDC branding
  • Managed infrastructure including validator operations, monthly reward distributions, and withdrawal-queue funding
  • Standard on-chain reporting

Partner Responsibilities

  • Surface the StakeXDC staking flow in their platform (embedded or linked, as agreed)
  • Direct users to the staking interface
  • Optional: provide supplementary user support

Comparison

White Label (Model A)Powered by StakeXDC (Model B)
BrandingPartner's brand onlyCo-branded
Integration effortHigher (custom frontend)Low (reuse the StakeXDC flow)
CustomizationFull control over UXCo-branding configuration
InfrastructureManaged by StakeXDCManaged by StakeXDC
SLACustom SLAStandard SLA
Best forExchanges, large custodiansWallets, aggregators, regional platforms

Commercial terms - including fees, revenue share, and SLA specifics - are discussed during the partnership process. Contact us for a tailored proposal.


Integration Process

PhaseActivities
DiscoveryRequirements gathering, technical scoping, commercial alignment
IntegrationTechnical setup, frontend development (if applicable), testing
UATUser acceptance testing in staging environment
Go-liveProduction deployment, monitoring, launch support

Timelines vary depending on the integration model and partner's technical readiness.


Next Steps

Contact us to discuss which model fits your needs:

On this page